Research Article

Influence of Dick and Carey instructional model on secondary school biology students’ performance in Katsina State, Nigeria

Suleiman Sa’adu Matazu 1 *
More Detail
1 Department of Science and Vocational Education, Faculty of Education and Extension Services, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Sokoto, Sokoto, NIGERIA* Corresponding Author
Mediterranean Journal of Social & Behavioral Research, 7(3), October 2023, 121-126, https://doi.org/10.30935/mjosbr/13301
Published Online: 21 May 2023, Published: 01 September 2023
OPEN ACCESS   699 Views   540 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The focus of this research is on the impact of Dick and Carey instructional model on the performance of secondary school biology students in Katsina State, Nigeria. Gender was also considered in the study to see if the Dick and Carey model could improve performance in biology regardless of gender. The study used a quasi-experimental design with pre- and post-test control groups. The study’s population consists of all senior secondary II (SSII) biology students in Katsina State. The study’s sample size is 140 SSII biology students. Purposive sampling was used to select four schools from the Funtua Educational Zone to participate in the study. Each school’s intact SSII class was used for the study. Two schools were assigned to experimental and control groups at random. The instruments for the study were Dick and Carey instructional model guide (DCIMG) and biology performance test (BPT). BPT was validated by experts from Usmanu Danfodiyo University’s biology department and experienced secondary school biology teachers. The split-half method yielded a reliability index of 0.71 for BPT. The study was guided by three null hypotheses, and the data collected was analyzed using descriptive statistics and t-test analysis. The results showed that the experimental group treated with DCIMG outperformed the control group treated with the traditional method. Furthermore, gender has no effect on student performance in biology. Thus, it was recommended, among other things, that DCIMG be used in biology teaching regardless of gender, especially when dealing with difficult concepts in biology.
Keywords: Dick and Carey instructional model, biology, traditional method, biology performance

CITATION (APA)

Sa’adu Matazu, S. (2023). Influence of Dick and Carey instructional model on secondary school biology students’ performance in Katsina State, Nigeria. Mediterranean Journal of Social & Behavioral Research, 7(3), 121-126. https://doi.org/10.30935/mjosbr/13301

REFERENCES

  1. Adedoyin, A. A., & Tayo, O. (2018). Effect of Dick and Carey instructional model students’ academic achievement in biology. Journal of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria.
  2. Adekunle, M. O. (2005). Problem-solving and concept mapping strategies: A determinant of students’ achievement and attitude to some environmental education concepts in social studies [Unpublished PhD thesis]. University of Ibadan.
  3. Ajayi, E. O. A. (2017). Global trends and emerging issues in teacher education in Nigeria [Keynote speech]. The 2nd Teachers’ Registration Council of Nigeria (TRCN) Induction for Graduate of Education, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago Iwoye, Ogun State, Nigeria.
  4. Akbulut, Y. (2007). Implications of two well-known models for instructional designers in distance education: Dick-Carey versus Morrison-Ross-Kemp. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 8(2), 62-68.
  5. Awobodu, V. Y. (2016). Problem-based learning and program instruction as strategies for enhancing learning outcomes in biology [Upblished PhD thesis]. Olabisi Onabanjo University.
  6. Bello, H., & Aliyu, U. O. (2012). Effect of Dick and Carey instructional model on the performance of electrical/electronic technology education students in some selected concepts in technical colleges in northern Nigeria. Educational Research, 3(3), 277-283.
  7. Briggs, L. J., Gustafson, K. L., & Tillman, M. H. (1991). Instructional design: Principles and applications. Educational Technology Publications.
  8. Dick, W., & Carey, L. M. (1996). The systematic design of instruction. HarperCollins.
  9. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J.vO. (2005). The systematic design of instruction. Pearson.
  10. Dijkstra, S. (1997). The integration of instructional systems design models and constructivist design principles. Instructional Science, 25(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002902427253
  11. Dijkstra, S. (2001). The design space for solving instructional design problems. Instructional Science, 29(1), 275-290. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011939724818
  12. Duchastel, P. C. (1990). Cognitive design for instructional design. Instructional Science, 19(1), 437-444. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119389
  13. FRN. (2013). National policy on education. Nigerian Educational Research and Development Council.
  14. Goksu, I., Ozcan, K. V., Cakir, R., & Goktas, Y. (2014). Studies related to instructional design models in Turkey. Elementary Education Online, 13(2), 694-709.
  15. Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2002). What is instructional design? In R. A. Reiser, & J. A. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 16-25). Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
  16. Matazu, S. S. (2021). Undergraduates’ perception of (STEM) education as a tool for enhancing economic development in Sokoto State, Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 8(4), 162-170. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET218431
  17. Merrill, M. D. (2001). Components of instruction toward a theoretical tool for instructional design. Instructional Science, 29(1), 291-310. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011943808888
  18. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2001). Designing effective instruction. Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  19. Ogunleye, B. O., & Babajide, V. F. T. (2011). Commitment to science and gender as determinant of students’ achievement and practical skills in physics. Journal of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, 46(1), 125-135.
  20. Ozdemir, E., & Uyangor, S. M. (2011). The instructional design model for mathematics education. E-Journal of New World Sciences Academy Education Sciences, 6(2), 1786-1796.
  21. Posner, G. J., & Rudnitsky, A. N. (2006). Course design: A guide to curriculum development for teachers. Pearson.
  22. Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Erlbaum.
  23. Sims, R. (2006). Beyond instructional design: Making learning design a reality. Journal of Learning Design, 1(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v1i2.11
  24. Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2004). Instructional design. Wiley Jossey Bass Education.
  25. WAEC. (2017). WAEC chief examiner’s report. West African Examination Council.
  26. Wasagu, M. A. (2019). Innovation in STEM education: The missing in Nigeria [Keynote speech]. The 60th Annual Conference of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria.