Research Article

When Student Teachers Meet First Graders in EFL Classrooms

Chiou-Hui Chou 1 *
More Detail
1 National Hsinchu University of Education, 521 Nanda Road, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan* Corresponding Author
Mediterranean Journal of Social & Behavioral Research, 1(1), July 2017, 30-43
OPEN ACCESS   994 Views   361 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The teaching practicum is often a capstone component of teacher education programs around the world, offering prospective teachers an opportunity to connect theory with practice under the guidance of their supervisors. Inquiry into student teachers’ learning can help bridge the gap between campus-based coursework and real classroom teaching in teacher education. This study reports on a university supervisor’s first year experience, observing student teachers’ teaching in EFL elementary classrooms, in particular, teaching first graders. Data were collected from classroom observations, post-observation discussions, and student teachers’ reflective journals. It finds that the university supervisor tended toward educative supervision, guiding student teachers to implement TESOL methodology from university coursework, to reflect on and learn from classroom experiences, and to examine the effects of their lessons and activities. Examining the classroom observations, the researcher also critically reflected on her university coursework regarding how to prepare prospective teachers to be successful in enacting complex teaching practices. Suggestions concerning the supervision of EFL student teachers are made along with recommendations for further research.
Keywords: EFL, Student Teachers, Teaching Practicum, TESOL

CITATION (APA)

Chou, C.-H. (2017). When Student Teachers Meet First Graders in EFL Classrooms. Mediterranean Journal of Social & Behavioral Research, 1(1), 30-43.

REFERENCES

  1. Anderson, L., & Stillman, J. (2011). Student teaching for a specialized view of professional practice? Opportunities to learn in and for urban, high-needs schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(5), 446-464.
  2. Ball, D., & Cohen, D. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Towards a practice-based theory of professional education. In L Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp.3-31). San Francisco.
  3. Bates, A., & Burbank, M. (2008). Effective student teacher supervision in the era of no child left behind. The Professional Educator, 32(2), 1-11.
  4. Bates, A., Drits, D., & Ramirez, L. (2011). Self-awareness and enactment of supervisory stance: Influences on responsiveness toward student teacher learning, Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(3), 69-87.
  5. Bridges, E. (1992). Problem-based learning for administrators. Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management, University of Oregon.
  6. Bullough, R.V., Jr. (2005). Teacher vulnerability and teach ability: A case study of a mentor and two interns. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(2), 23-40.
  7. Cochran-Smith, M., Barnatt, J., Friedman, A., & Pine, G. (2009). Inquiry on inquiry: Practitioner research and student learning. Action in Teacher Education, 31(2), 17-32.
  8. Correnti, R. (2007). An empirical investigation of professional development: Effects on literacy instruction using daily logs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29(4), 262-295.
  9. Crockett, M. D. (2002). Inquiry as professional development: Creating dilemmas through teachers’ work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(5), 609-624.
  10. Fitzgerald, J., & Graves, M. F. (2004). Scaffolding reading experiences for English-language learners. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc.
  11. Fosnot, C. T. (1993). In search of understanding: The case of constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  12. Fuller, F., & Brown, O.H. (1975). Becoming a teacher. In K. Ryan (Ed.), Teacher education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  13. Gan, Z. (2013). Learning to teach English language in the practicum: What Challenges do non-native ESL student teachers face? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(3), 92-108.
  14. Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. White Plains, NY: Longman.
  15. Harre, R., & Secord, P. (1972). The explanation of social behavior. Oxford: Blackwell.
  16. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis. Harlow: Longman.
  17. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  18. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
  19. Ralph, E. (2003). Enhancing mentorship in the practicum: Improving contextual supervision. McGill Journal of Education, 38(1), 28-48.
  20. Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record, 104(4), 842-866.
  21. Sandholtz, J. H. (2011). Preservice teachers’ conceptions of effective and ineffective teaching practices. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(3), 27-47.
  22. Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
  23. Soslau, E. (2012). Opportunities to develop adaptive teaching expertise during supervisory conferences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 768-779.
  24. Sullivan, S., & Glanz, J. (2013). Supervision that improves teaching and learning: Strategies and techniques (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  25. Supovitz, J. A., & Christman, J. B. (2005). Small learning communities that actually learn: Lessons for school leaders. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(9), 649-651.
  26. Zeichner, K. (2002). Beyond traditional structures of student teaching. Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(2), 59-64.