Research Article

Biophilia: A View of Human-Nature in an Era of Contradictions

Fay Bigloo 1, Jeanne Adèle Kentel 1 *
More Detail
1 University of British Columbia, CANADA* Corresponding Author
Mediterranean Journal of Social & Behavioral Research, 2(2-3), December 2018, 23-26, https://doi.org/10.30935/mjosbr/8384
OPEN ACCESS   1229 Views   848 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The natural world and humanity through an interrelated series of appropriations are in critical condition, perhaps even approaching extinction and human beings are increasingly disconnected from the natural environment due to advancement of biotechnologies that engender new forms of existence (Braidotti, 2013). In order to respond to the profound transformation of this era, this inquiry draws on Wilson’s (1984) notion of biophilia, which suggests there is an inherent connection between humans and the natural environment. The intention is to deepen understanding of, relationality through the lens of educational experience or currere (Pinar, 1975) thereby cultivating possibilities for a curriculum of ecological consciousness. This paper focuses on the inter-relationship of humans and nature and argues for a reconceptualization of the ways we live and educate. Through a narration of lived experiences the potential of re-humanizing curricula through encounters of our integrated bodies in nature is evoked.

CITATION (APA)

Bigloo, F., & Kentel, J. A. (2018). Biophilia: A View of Human-Nature in an Era of Contradictions. Mediterranean Journal of Social & Behavioral Research, 2(2-3), 23-26. https://doi.org/10.30935/mjosbr/8384

REFERENCES

  1. Abram, D. (1996). The spell of the sensuous: Perception and language in a more-than-human world. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
  2. Baker, M. (2005). Landfullness in adventure-based programming: Promoting reconnection to the land. Journal of Experiential Education, 27(3), 267-276. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590502700306
  3. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  4. Brown, C. S., & Toadvine, T. (Eds.) (2003). Eco-phenomenology: Back to the earth itself.
  5. Howell, A. J., Dopko R. L., Passmore, H. A., & Buro, K. (2011). Nature connectedness: associations with well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(2), 166-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.037
  6. Kentel, J. A., & Karrow, D. (2007). Mystery and the Body: Provoking a deep ecology through the situated bodies of teacher candidates. An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 4(1), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.29173/cmplct8762
  7. Knapp, C. E. (2005). The “I-thou” relationship, place based education, and Aldo Leopold. Journal of Experiential Education, 27(3), 277-285. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590502700307
  8. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945/2012). Phenomenology of perception. D.A. Landes (Trans.) London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203720714
  9. Phillips, D. C. (2014). Encyclopedia of educational theory and philosophy. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483346229
  10. Pinar, W. F. (1975). The method of “currere”. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Research Association, April, 1975, Washington, D.C.
  11. Pinar, W. F. (2015). Educational experience as lived knowledge, history, alterity the selected works of William F. Pinar. New York, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315752594
  12. Pinar, W. R. (2006). The synoptic text today and other essays curriculum development after the reconceptualization. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  13. Ryan, R. M., Weinstein, N., Bernstein, J., Brown, K. W., Mistretta, L., & Gagne, M. (2010). Vitalizing effects of being outdoors and in nature. The Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.009
  14. Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  15. Wood, D. (2001). What is ecophenomenology? Research in Phenomenology, 31(1), 78-95. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691640160048577